+1 619 822 1745 [email protected]

Meeting Needs

User Comments

Corepoint

  • “Relatively easy learning curve to get productive with the engine. The documentation is heads and tails above anything else I’ve seen. And their customer support is the bar all other should aspire to. They are excellent, eager to help and follow-up to ensure your questions or issues are resolved to your satisfaction.”
  • “Initial FTP functionally was lacking in support for large file delivery, but that has now been addressed with the newer version.”
  • “Corepoint fully met my top requirements that included excellent vendor support, ease of use configuration and management, and high availability operational workflow.”

Cloverleaf

  • “The support is great and anytime we have a project that I am not sure how to proceed with, support has been great to work and help plan what is needed. We have never missed a mark with Cloverleaf and have been recognized as one the most connected hospitals.”
  • “Fabulous HL7 and EDI engine; however, everything “specialized” requires an additional module.”
  • “It is a very stable interface engine and provides great flexibility with the availability to write TCL code and connect to external databases for more complex tasks.”

Ensemble

  • “Healthshare’s Ensemble provided the necessary tool to integrate several systems quickly and easily. It has a fantastic mirroring technology so that the systems will have little to no downtime.”
  •  “It is very configurable, which is great. However, it is difficult to manage all the customizations.”
  • “Ensemble has impressed me in what it can do besides being an interface engine. As an interface engine it does what it should and is flexible. The analytic options are what sets Ensemble apart.”

Mirth

  • “The development cycle is intuitive and easy to implement. Integration can be both simple and robust (complex), which allows the engine to server a wide variety of systems and applications. The integrated database allows for quick and easy transaction retrieval and reprocessing. Support has been stellar as well. All in all is is exactly what we were looking for in an integration engine.”
  • “Mirth Connect offers a lot of flexibility for a developer, because you can do NEARLY anything with Javascript. However, there are limitations to the things you can do when compared to using Javascript to build a website or app. Mirth Connect is a terrible consumer of server/vm resources.”
  • “It has been able to meet every demand we have thrown at it. It has become the foundation of our analytics and reporting systems.”

Rhapsody

  • “It’s easy to use once you get past the learning curve. They offer great training, the support is decent, the engine has a lot of capability, and under the throughput we have it at, it’s stable.
  • “I have been involved with developing interfaces for over 10 years, last 5 in Healthcare and Rhapsody. I find the tool to be the best I have used and supports our needs well. I have found Orion support to be excellent.”
  • “Stable, easy to use interface engine that is feature rich. The FHIR implementation seems a bit complex and I am hoping in coming releases they simplify it. The vendor listens to its customers and over 10 of my enhancement requests have appeared in the 6.2 release. This is fantastic for a company of this size to respond that well to a single customer.”
  • “Rhapsody is a very mature product, with significant integration tools. Greater flexibility around the handling of large files and shorter retention for higher rate interfaces would be helpful.”
Compare All Ratings in Survey Summary

0% – Barely Meets Our Needs
100% – Completely Meets Our Need

Corepoint

89%

Ensemble

88%

Rhapsody

87%

Cloverleaf

83%

Mirth

Ratings

Meeting Needs Features & Usability Additional Features Implementation Setup Stability & Scalability Support & Services Total Cost of Ownership Vendor Vs. Partner
Overall Rating