+1 619 822 1745 [email protected]

Additional Features

User Comments

Corepoint

  • “I love the ability to set up alerts so you know that queue is building up or have lost connectivity, etc. It’s easy to set up security so users can see only certain connections and then can additionally set whether they can edit and/or resend messages, etc.”
  • “User auditing was the newest feature that surprised me. In the event of an audit, we can see everywhere the messages went and even see each IT staff that may have viewed in a console.”
  • “The Corepoint Monitor is one awesome tool. There are a lot of features built into the monitor. The ability to share the monitor with other departments is nothing short of amazing! Our end users now have insight into their own relevant interfaces whether it is laboratory, radiology, or other departments.”

Cloverleaf

  • “The new global monitor is a great tool. Security server is a bit kludgy in my mind.”
  • “A little harder for me to implement Web Services, but support was great to work with. Monitoring is great, because of the app on the mobile phone I am able to monitor and control remotely.”
  • “Web Services are poorly developed in the product. Training is non-existent. Setting things up for web services is very non-intuitive (compared to every other integration type within the product).”

Ensemble

  • “Lots of custom work to implement some monitoring and was not standard across the board.”
  • “Excellent monitoring features once they are setup and configured correctly.”
  • “The Deepsee analytics is pretty resource intensive.”

Mirth

  • “Implementing these features is not complex at all and since this is an open source product you can use the community for help and vendor documentation.”
  • “HTTPS is not available out of the box, but in general non-secured web services are easily implemented. We built a front-end wrapper to consume on HTTPS, then send to Mirth via HTTP to overcome that hurdle.
  • “It is fairly complex, each requiring custom coding using Javascript and RHINO.”

Rhapsody

  • “Web services can be a little daunting, but that’s the nature of WS. Monitoring is pretty good, you can set up watchlists and it pretty much just takes care of itself. LDAP was also simple to set up and there’s good documentation online for it.”
  • “None of them are complex, however it does take some learning particularly for people who have never done web services before.”
  • “Monitoring is not quite where it needs to be. It is cumbersome to set up and should have documentation and escalation features.”
  • “If one is familiar with developing for web services this is an excellent platform, monitory and security is straight forward.”
Compare All Ratings in Survey Summary

0% – poor
100% – excellent

Corepoint

88%

Rhapsody

82%

Ensemble

78%

Cloverleaf

67%

Mirth

Ratings

Meeting Needs Features & Usability Additional Features Implementation Setup Stability & Scalability Support & Services Total Cost of Ownership Vendor Vs. Partner
Overall Rating