As a national vendor-neutral IT solutions provider, a lot of people ask us questions like “How would you compare Healthcare Interface Engines A and B?” Obviously, the question they’re really asking is, “Which interface engine is right for ME?” and the answer is dependent on what your needs are.
Over 200 healthcare IT professionals participated in this year’s survey, many providing very specific input on the nine areas covered. These results present the reviews on the five interface engines that garnered the most responses: Corepoint, Cloverleaf, Ensemble, Rhapsody, and Mirth.
We provided the numerical rating for each area followed by a sampling of comments that are consistent with the broader collective input so you get a good look at what people really think about the solutions they’re using. The good, the bad, and even the ugly. Ready to find out which healthcare interface engine is right for you?
have worked with the tool for 3-5 YEARS
> 1
Year
1-2
Years
6-10
Years
10+
Years
have been in the healthcare integration field for 10 + YEARS
> 1
Year
1-2
Years
3-5
Years
6-10
Years
are developers or programmers
CIO/VP IT
IT/IS DIRECTOR
MANAGER
TEAM LEAD
ARCHITECT
PROJECT MANAGER
ANALYST
OTHER
describe their current employer as a HOSPITAL or HOSPITAL SYSTEM
HEALTH
INFORMATION
EXCHANGE
INDEPENDENT
PHYSICIAN
ORGANIZATION
GOVERNMENT
HEALTHCARE
ORGINIZATION
SOFTWARE
VENDOR
HARDWARE
VENDOR
CONSULTING
FIRM
OTHER
Unlike your other healthcare technology vendors, Core Health Technologies is an unbiased and neutral partner that is only concerned with one thing: your interoperability success.
Regardless of your integration technology, we can help you connect all the dots.
© 2017 Core Health Technologies
